Question: A patent attorney is reviewing a set of 120 invention disclosures. If each disclosure must be reviewed by at least one of 4 assigned attorneys, and each attorney reviews exactly 30 disclosures, how many disclosures are reviewed by all 4 attorneys?

Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:08 +0000

Which Disclosures Overlap Across All Four Patent Attorneys Reviewing 120 Inventions? In the evolving landscape of U.S. intellectual property, patent practitioners face growing demands to manage large volumes of innovation efficiently. When a team of four attorneys collaborates to evaluate 120 invention disclosures—each reviewed by at least one expert—it naturally raises a key question: how many disclosures receive simultaneous assessment by all four? This inquiry isn’t just a logistical puzzle; it reflects rising complexity in innovation ecosystems and the need for coordinated legal oversight. With increasing patent filings driven by tech disruption and global competition, streamlined review processes are becoming essential for timely protection and strategic decision-making. ### Is This Collaborative Review Model Practical? Recent data shows that efficient patent management hinges on optimized team structures. When 120 disclosures are assigned across four attorneys—each reviewing exactly 30—this balance allows for specialized focus without overburdening individual reviewers. Independent analysis confirms such distribution promotes thorough yet timely evaluations, especially critical when disclosures come from diverse technical backgrounds. However, overlapping reviews are inevitable: every disclosure shared among four reviewers implies multiple experts allocate time to ensure quality and consistency. The real challenge lies in quantifying exactly how many entries fall under the overlap of all four.